On the specifics of philosophical Postmodern interpretation

Keywords: postmodernism, philosophical thinking, postmodern philosophy

Abstract

The article explores the reasons of negative assessments of philosophical maxims of the founders of postmodern philosophy. It is highlighted the overall transformation process of the role and importance of philosophical thought in social life, specific historical mission as well as the scientific, the new philosophical tradition theoretical foundations, initiated within the proclaimed postmodern paradigm.

Author Biography

Constantine Raida, G. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of History of Foreign Philosophy, G. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

References

Anderson, P. (2011), The Origins of Postmodernity [Istoki postmoderna], “Territoriya budushchego” Publishing House, Moscow, 208 p. [in Russian]

Barthes, R. (1985), L'Aventure semiologique, Seuil, Paris, 368 p.

Baudrillard, J. (1990), La transparence du mat, Galilée, Paris, 182 p.

Bertens, H. (1995), The Idea of the Postmodern: A History, Routledge, London, 284 p.

Caputo, J. D. (1997), Deconstruction in a Nutshell.: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida, Fordham University Press, New York, 195 р.

Deleuze, G. (1969), Logique du sens, Éd. de Minuit, Paris, 392 p.

Deleuze G., Guattari F. (1991), Qu'est-ce que la philosophie?, Les Éditions de Minuit (coll. “Criti-que”), Paris, 1991, 206 p.

Deleuze G., Guattari F. (1976), Rhizome, Edit, de Minuit, Paris, 74 p.

Deleuze G., Guattari F. (1972), Capitalisme et schizophrénie: L`Anti-Oedipe, Éd. de Minuit, Paris, 470 p.

Derrida, J. (2002), “Does philosophy have own language? (Jacques Derrida’s answers the questions of Autrement publishing)” Dust of Extinct Ashes [“Est' li u filosofii svoi yazyk? (Otvety Zhaka Derrida na voprosy izdatel'stva Autrement)” Zoly ugasshei prakh], translated from French by V. Lapitskii, Academic Project, St. Petersburg, 121 p. [in Russian]

Postphilosophy. Three Paradigms in the History of Thought [Postfilosofiya. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli] (2009), Moscow, 744 p. [in Russian]

Foucault, M. (2008), L'Archeologie du savoir, Gallimard, Paris, 294 p.

Lévinas, E. (1974), Autrement qu'être ou au-delà de l'essence, Martinus Nijhoff, La Haye,pp. X+233.

Lévinas, E. (1997), “Quelques réflexions sur la philosophie de l’hitlerisme”, Suivi d’un essai de Miguel Abensour, Payot et Rivages, Paris, 109 p.

Luk’ianets, V.S., Sobol, O. M. (1998), Philosophical Postmodern [Filosofskyi postmodern], Abrys, Kyiv, 320 p. [in Ukrainian]

Lyotard, J.-F. (1983), “Answering question: What is postmodernism?, Innovation/Renovation: New perspectives on the humanities [Ed. by Hassan 1., Hassan S], Madison, pp. 329 – 341.

Sokal, A., Bricmont, J. (2002), Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science [Intellektual'nye ulovki. Kritika sovremennoi filosofii postmoderna], “House of Intellectual Book”, Moscow, 248 p. [in Russian]

Veith, Jr., G. E. (2000), Posmodern Times. A Christian Guide to Contemporary Thought and Culture [Vremena postmoderna. Khristianskii vzglyad na sovremennuyu mysl' i kul'turu], “Lutheran Heritage” Foundation, Moscow, 240 p. [in Russian]
Published
2016-04-26
How to Cite
Raida, C. (2016). On the specifics of philosophical Postmodern interpretation. IDEAS. PHILOSOPHICAL JOURNAL. SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC ISSUES, (1(7)-2(8), 108-121. Retrieved from https://ideas.academyjournal.org/index.php/IDEI/article/view/154
Section
Philosophical reflections