The problem of hell and the second chance theory in Anglo-American philoso-phy of religion
Abstract
Problem of hell is a philosophical problem related to theological doctrine of eternal pun-ishment. It is a variation of the problem of evil. With a few exceptions, the traditional concept of hell has prevailed in Christian thought since the time of early Christianity and until the XIX century. In general, this doctrine of afterlife teaches that after death the souls of sinners fall into hell, where they punished by eter-nal fire. The article presents some objections to the traditional model of hell and considers a number of al-ternative theories. The particular attention has been paid to The Second Chance Theory and its varieties (escapism). Author of the article shows that such escapists as A. Buckareff, A. Plug and others under-stood the hell as an autonomous place or state, which God creates for those who do not want to communi-cate with him. Accordingly, the inhabitants of hell may at any time change their status and join the commu-nity of the saved. The author analyzes how this theory related to the concept of metaphysical libertarian free will, which admitted by the supporters of free will theodicy (R. Swinburne, E. Stump).The author con-cludes that current religious and philosophical reflection developing in the discourse of humanist culture tend to rational criticism, which rejects the traditional model of hell for reasons of moral, psychological, log-ical and philosophical nature. This creates a need for new theories, designed to amend or reinterpret the traditional concept of hell.
References
Baker, R.W. (2014), Issuant Views of Hell in Contemporary Anglo-American Theology, Abo Akademi University Press, Abo, 239 p.
Balthasar, H. (1988), Dare we hope: “that all men be saved”?; With a short discourse on hell, Ignati-us Press, San Francisco, 254 p.
Buckareff, A., Plug, A. (2005), “Escaping Hell: Divine Motivation and the Problem of Hell”, Religious Studies, 41 (1), pp. 39 – 54.
Kvanvig, J. (1993), The problem of hell, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 192 p.
Lewis, C. S. (2009), The Problem of Pain, HarperCollins, New York, 176 p.
Lewis, D. (2007), “Divine Evil”, Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Editor M. A. Louise, New York, pp. 231 – 242.
Pinnock, C.H. (1996), “The conditional view”, Four views on hell. Editor W. Crockett. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, pp. 135 – 166.
Ragland, C.P. (2009), “Love and Damnation”, Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. Editor K. Timpe. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 206 – 224.
Sanders, J. (2005), “Those Who Have Never Heard: A Survey of the Major Positions”, viewed 06 March 2015, available at: http://rsc.byu.edu/archived/salvation-christ-comparative-christian-views/13-those-who-havenever-heard-survey-major#_edn29
Stump, E. (1986), “Dante’s Hell, Aquinas’s Moral Theory, and the Love of God”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (2), pp. 181 – 198.
Swinburne, R. (1983), “A Theodicy of Heaven and Hell”, The Existence and Nature of God. Editor A. J. Freddoso. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 37 – 54.
Swinburne, R. (1989), Responsibility and Atonement, Oxford University Press, New York, 224 p.
Vennari, J. (2006), “Limbo to be Cast into the Outer Darkness?”, viewed 06 March 2015, available at: http://www.fatima.org/news/newsviews/limbo.asp
