The concept of deep communication and neo-Protestant theology
Keywords:
neo-Protestantism, theology, communication, meeting, dialogue, existence, personality, inter-subjective intercourse
Abstract
In this article we are trying to present basic ideas of exponents of neo-protestant theology, which con-cerns views on problematics of human communication. We are exploring the ideas of E. Brunner, F. Gogarten and D. Bonhoffer. These ideas are so remarkable for creating the integral conception of Christian neo-orthodoxy and making more profound our philosophical insights about existential and ontological aspects of inter-personal communication
References
Batishchev, G. S. (1995) Some Features of Deep Cojmmunication Culture [Osobennosti kul'tury glubinnogo obshcheniya], Problems of Pilosophy (Voprosy filosofii), №3, pp. 109 – 129 [in Russian].
Bonhoffer, D. (1994), Resistance and Obedience (Soprotivlenie i pokornost'), Progress, Moscow, 334 p. [in Russian].
Bonhoffer, D. “Life in Christian Communication” (“Zhizn' v khristianskom obshchenii”) [Digital resource], available at (28.03.2017): http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/protestant/Bonh/03.php [in Russian]
Brunner, E. (2009), Nature and Grace: to Conversation with K. Bart. Comparative Theology. Deutsch Protestantism XX c (Priroda i blagodat': beseda s K. Bartom. Sravnitel'noe bogoslovie: nemetskii protestantizm ХХ veka), PSTGU Publishing House, Moscow, 552 pp. [in Russian].
Gavriluk, T. (2013), “The Conception of Human Kind in Protestantism of XX c.” (“Kontseptsiia liudstva v protestantyzmi 20 st.”), Worldview – Philosophy – Religion, No. 4, pp. 131 – 139.
Garadja, V. I. (1986), “Protestant Conception of Human Kind” (“Protestantskaya kontseptsiya chelovechestv”), Bourgeois Philosopical Anthropology of XX c., Science, Moscow, pp. 279 – 293. [in Russian]
Cherenkov, M. “Protestant Theology and Pilosophy of Religion: meetings on the borders of Another” [Digital resource], available at (28.03.2017): http://www.religion.in.ua/main/bogoslovya/11710-protestantskaya-teologiya-i-filosofiya-religii-vstrechi-na-granicax-inogo.html [in Russian]
Brunner, Е. (1962), Truth as Encounter, Lutterworth, London, 210 p.
Bonhoffer, D. (1994), Resistance and Obedience (Soprotivlenie i pokornost'), Progress, Moscow, 334 p. [in Russian].
Bonhoffer, D. “Life in Christian Communication” (“Zhizn' v khristianskom obshchenii”) [Digital resource], available at (28.03.2017): http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/protestant/Bonh/03.php [in Russian]
Brunner, E. (2009), Nature and Grace: to Conversation with K. Bart. Comparative Theology. Deutsch Protestantism XX c (Priroda i blagodat': beseda s K. Bartom. Sravnitel'noe bogoslovie: nemetskii protestantizm ХХ veka), PSTGU Publishing House, Moscow, 552 pp. [in Russian].
Gavriluk, T. (2013), “The Conception of Human Kind in Protestantism of XX c.” (“Kontseptsiia liudstva v protestantyzmi 20 st.”), Worldview – Philosophy – Religion, No. 4, pp. 131 – 139.
Garadja, V. I. (1986), “Protestant Conception of Human Kind” (“Protestantskaya kontseptsiya chelovechestv”), Bourgeois Philosopical Anthropology of XX c., Science, Moscow, pp. 279 – 293. [in Russian]
Cherenkov, M. “Protestant Theology and Pilosophy of Religion: meetings on the borders of Another” [Digital resource], available at (28.03.2017): http://www.religion.in.ua/main/bogoslovya/11710-protestantskaya-teologiya-i-filosofiya-religii-vstrechi-na-granicax-inogo.html [in Russian]
Brunner, Е. (1962), Truth as Encounter, Lutterworth, London, 210 p.
Published
2018-02-27
How to Cite
Strelkova, J. (2018). The concept of deep communication and neo-Protestant theology. IDEAS. PHILOSOPHICAL JOURNAL. SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC ISSUES, (1(11), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.34017/1313-9703-2018-1(11)-89-95
Section
Philosophy of Religion. Religion studies
